Academic writing requires you to do more than just express your own opinions without support. However, you are also asked to provide original work which is more than just a report that lists information. The challenge of academic writing is to find the balance between the extremes of opinion and list-making.
You can accomplish this by mixing example (evidence) with explanation (“e+e”) in order to claim ownership of intellectual property.
In using the “e+e” technique, the writer is similar to a lawyer in a courtroom. Does a lawyer just present the evidence and then expect the jury members to figure it out on their own? Of course not. Likewise, writers will present an example or some sort of evidence in support of a particular point. Then the writers will explain that example/evidence to apply it to the point being made. In doing this, the writers will identify what they believe the example/evidence means as well as what significance that example/evidence’s meaning has in supporting the point being made. In this way, each writer is able to integrate the “e+e” combination through synthesis and analysis.
As a student writer, you can avoid plagiarism and produce original work by citing the particular source and clearly showing the shift from example to explanation. Often, the change is clear because the citation occurs between the two. In cases where the citation does not appear at the end of the example, student writers can use transition phrasing to show the shift. Expressions such as “what this means …,” “this is important because ….,” or even a simple “in other words …” will signal to the reader that the writers are now providing their original work by expressing their own understanding of the meaning and significance of the example/evidence. In doing so, the writers are claiming the writing as their own intellectual property.
Generally, information that is well known or commonly expressed does not need to be cited.
Common knowledge: Information such as definitions from dictionaries, facts from history, well-known concepts, etc. would not need to be cited if the details can easily be confirmed from a variety of sources in addition to a particular source the writer has used.
Examples:
Uncommon knowledge: Specific definitions, obscure historical facts, complex or unusual concepts, information that requires further explanation, etc. would need to be cited. Information from specialized dictionaries or encyclopedias such as a pharmacological or medical text needs to be cited.
Example:
When in doubt, cite: Because so much information is available through the Internet and other electronic sources, the nature of “common” knowledge is sometimes not very clear. If you are not sure how well known the information or concept might be, you should cite the source to help your readers/ audience confirm the content. Remember: any time the exact words and phrasing are copied directly from the source, the content should always be set in quotation marks and cited.